-
No single PCR test is sufficient to determine parvovirus IHHNV presence in or impact on farmed shrimp production
- Back
Metadata
Document Title
No single PCR test is sufficient to determine parvovirus IHHNV presence in or impact on farmed shrimp production
Name from Authors Collection
Affiliations
Aquatic Animal Health Research Team, Integrative Aquaculture Biotechnology Research Group, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Bangkok, Thailand; Aquatic Animal Health Research and Development Division, Department of Fisheries, Songkhla Aquatic Animal Health Research and Development Center, Songkhla, Thailand; Department of Fisheries, Coastal Aquaculture Research and Development Division, Bangkok, Thailand; Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; Center of Excellence for Shrimp Molecular Biology and Biotechnology (Centex Shrimp), Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; Mahidol University, Nakhonsawan Campus, Nakhon Sawan, Thailand; National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Khlong Luang, Thailand
Source Title
Journal of the World Aquaculture Society
ISSN
8938849
Year
2025
Volume
56
Issue
4
Open Access
All Open Access; Gold Open Access; Green Open Access
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons Inc
DOI
10.1111/jwas.70046
Abstract
The main purpose of this report is to provide hard evidence that the shrimp parvovirus, infectious hypodermal and hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHHNV), has not resulted “in significant consequences, for example, production losses, morbidity or mortality at a zone or country level” in Thailand since at least 2010. It also reveals that no single polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test is sufficient to identify IHHNV-infected shrimp. It presents historical evidence and new evidence from 11 commercial ponds cultivating the giant tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon in Thailand. These ponds were selected because they were the ponds that gave positive PCR test results for IHHNV using two methods recommended for IHHNV diagnosis by World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH) (IHHNV-309 and IHHNV-389). However, an additional in-house “IHHNV Long-amp method” (IHHNV-LA) was also used to amplify 90% of the 4-kb IHHNV genome sequence, and it also gave false-positive test results with 2 of the 11 ponds (IHHNV-LA positive, but histological tests negative). Further tests using normal histopathological analysis for the presence of pathognomonic Cowdry A type inclusions (CAI), in situ hybridization (ISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) could confirm IHHNV infections in only two of the three ponds PCR-positive using all three PCR methods. In addition, positive detection of CAI alone was equivalent to ISH or IHC in confirming IHHNV infection after a positive test with any of the PCR methods used. In summary, the recommended WOAH PCR methods gave false-positive test results for IHHNV infection with 9/11 ponds (82%). All 11 ponds gave profitable harvests despite the confirmation of IHHNV in two ponds, where it was accompanied by various additional pathogens. Unfortunately, according to current practice, positive PCR test results with the WOAH methods alone sometimes leads to rejection of traded shrimp products without assurance that the test results are not false-positive results that may arise from endogenous viral elements (EVE). © 2025 The Author(s). Journal of the World Aquaculture Society published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of World Aquaculture Society.
Keyword
false positive | IHHNV detection method | Infectious hypodermal and hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHHNV) | long-amp IHHNV (IHHNV-LA) detection | office international des epizooties (OIE) | Penaeus monodon | World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH)
Industrial Classification
Knowledge Taxonomy Level 1
Knowledge Taxonomy Level 2
Knowledge Taxonomy Level 3
License
CC BY-NC
Rights
Authors
Publication Source
Scopus
Publication Source
Scopus