Home > Collections > NSTDA's Research Publications > Effects of Public Service Motivation on R&D Project-Based Team Learning Where Psychological Safety Is a Mediator and Project Management Style Is a Moderator
Effects of Public Service Motivation on R&D Project-Based Team Learning Where Psychological Safety Is a Mediator and Project Management Style Is a Moderator
Effects of Public Service Motivation on R&D Project-Based Team Learning Where Psychological Safety Is a Mediator and Project Management Style Is a Moderator
Author
Pattanatornchai J., Kohda Y., Javed A., Udomvitid K., Yenradee P.
Affiliations
School of Information Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Nomi, 923-1211, Japan; School of Information, Computer, and Communication Technology, Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand; National Electronics and Computer Technology Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand
Type
Article
Source Title
Journal of Imaging
ISSN
2313433X
Year
2024
Volume
10
Issue
4
Open Access
All Open Access, Gold
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
DOI
10.3390/jimaging10040088
Abstract
A gait is a walking pattern that can help identify a person. Recently, gait analysis employed a vision-based pose estimation for further feature extraction. This research aims to identify a person by analyzing their walking pattern. Moreover, the authors intend to expand gait analysis for other tasks, e.g., the analysis of clinical, psychological, and emotional tasks. The vision-based human pose estimation method is used in this study to extract the joint angles and rank correlation between them. We deploy the multi-view gait databases for the experiment, i.e., CASIA-B and OUMVLP-Pose. The features are separated into three parts, i.e., whole, upper, and lower body features, to study the effect of the human body part features on an analysis of the gait. For person identity matching, a minimum Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) distance is determined. Additionally, we apply a majority voting algorithm to integrate the separated matching results from multiple cameras to enhance accuracy, and it improved up to approximately 30% compared to matching without majority voting. ? 2024 by the authors.