-
Anticancer properties of distinct antimalarial drug classes
- Back
Metadata
Document Title
Anticancer properties of distinct antimalarial drug classes
Author
Van Huijsduijnen R.H.,Guy R.K.,Chibale K.,Haynes R.K.,Peitz I.,Kelter G.,Phillips M.A.,Vennerstrom J.L.,Yuthavong Y.,Wells T.N.C.
Name from Authors Collection
Affiliations
Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV), Geneva, Switzerland; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States; Department of Chemistry, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa; Centre of Excellence for Pharmaceutical Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa; Oncotest GmbH, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Pharmacology, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States; BIOTEC, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Thailand Science Park, Pathumthani, Thailand
Type
Article
Source Title
PLoS ONE
ISSN
19326203
Year
2013
Volume
8
Issue
12
Open Access
All Open Access, Gold, Green
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0082962
Abstract
We have tested five distinct classes of established and experimental antimalarial drugs for their anticancer potential, using a panel of 91 human cancer lines. Three classes of drugs: artemisinins, synthetic peroxides and DHFR (dihydrofolate reductase) inhibitors effected potent inhibition of proliferation with IC50s in the nM- low μM range, whereas a DHODH (dihydroorotate dehydrogenase) and a putative kinase inhibitor displayed no activity. Furthermore, significant synergies were identified with erlotinib, imatinib, cisplatin, dasatinib and vincristine. Cluster analysis of the antimalarials based on their differential inhibition of the various cancer lines clearly segregated the synthetic peroxides OZ277 and OZ439 from the artemisinin cluster that included artesunate, dihydroartemisinin and artemisone, and from the DHFR inhibitors pyrimethamine and P218 (a parasite DHFR inhibitor), emphasizing their shared mode of action. In order to further understand the basis of the selectivity of these compounds against different cancers, microarray-based gene expression data for 85 of the used cell lines were generated. For each compound, distinct sets of genes were identified whose expression significantly correlated with compound sensitivity. Several of the antimalarials tested in this study have well-established and excellent safety profiles with a plasma exposure, when conservatively used in malaria, that is well above the IC50s that we identified in this study. Given their unique mode of action and potential for unique synergies with established anticancer drugs, our results provide a strong basis to further explore the potential application of these compounds in cancer in pre-clinical or and clinical settings. © 2013 Hooft van Huijsduijnen et al.
Industrial Classification
Knowledge Taxonomy Level 1
Knowledge Taxonomy Level 2
Knowledge Taxonomy Level 3
License
CC BY
Rights
Author
Publication Source
Scopus